Kajian Akulturasi Budaya terhadap Tarian Tortor Sombah dalam Perayaan Pesta Olob-olob di GKPS Nagori Dolok
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis akulturasi budaya terhadap tarian Tortor Sombah dalam perayaan Pesta Olob-Olob di GKPS Nagori Dolok. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi bagaimana proses akulturasi antara budaya Simalungun dan nilai-nilai Kristen terjadi tanpa menghilangkan esensi budaya asli. Metode penelitian yang digunakan meliputi wawancara dan observasi langsung terhadap pelaksanaan perayaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tarian Tortor Sombah mengalami transformasi dengan menggabungkan elemen-elemen budaya lokal dan praktik keagamaan, seperti penggunaan medley dua lagu dan perubahan gerakan, yang tetap mencerminkan tujuan utama penyembahan kepada Tuhan. Meskipun ada tantangan dalam penerimaan akulturasi, sebagian besar jemaat GKPS Nagori Dolok menerima perubahan ini sebagai upaya untuk memperkaya tradisi. Akulturasi ini tidak hanya memberikan dampak positif dalam memperbaharui tarian, tetapi juga membantu menjaga identitas budaya Simalungun di tengah perubahan zaman. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perayaan Pesta Olob-Olob dan tarian Tortor Sombah memainkan peran penting dalam melestarikan warisan budaya dan spiritual jemaat, serta menciptakan ruang untuk integrasi antara tradisi lokal dan ajaran Kristen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".