Le régime d'examen des plaintes du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux : examen d'un régime à parfaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé: Cet essai se veut une réflexion sur le régime d'examen des plaintes du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux et plus précisément, sur les changements y ayant été apportés suite à l'entrée en vigueur des dispositions du Projet de loi 83 au cours de l'année 2006. Un bref survol y est donc fait des rôles ayant été confiés par le législateur québécois à chacun des acteurs impliqués dans la procédure de traitement des plaintes. Sont ensuite analysées les différentes améliorations apportées par la réforme. Enfin, sont abordées les difficultés persistantes auxquelles se bute le régime d 'examen des plaintes de même que différentes pistes de solution qui pourraient permettre de les résoudre.||Abstract: This essay is a reflection on the complaint examination procedure of the health and social services network and more precisely on the repercussions of bill 83 that came into force in 2006 . An overview of the tasks that have been assigned by Quebec's legislator to every participant in the complaint examination procedure is followed by an analysis of the reform's improvements . The remaining difficulties related to the complaint examination procedure are then examined and possible solutions are proposed to overcome these difficulties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".