MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029634926

Landscape as Memorial: A.Y. Jackson and the Landscape of the Western Front, 1917â1918

2012· article· en· W7029634926 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmExhibitionContext (archaeology)Government (linguistics)Spanish Civil WarWorld War IIService (business)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alexander Young Jackson ( 1882-197 4) was convalescing in England from wounds received while on active service in France.At the same time that Jackson was convalescing, two of his paintings, completed before the outbreak of war in 1914, were on exhibit at the Ontario Society of Artists' exhibition in Toronto, in a context far removed from that of the battlefield. 1Writing about this show, the critic Estelle Kerr observed, "if it is true that the Canadian public are longing for war pictures, our Government should follow the example of France and England where the best artists are exempt from military service but granted permission to wear uniforms and circulate ... in the war zone making pictures which will be of inestimable value."She concluded, however, that "the idea of a Canadian public longing for art in any form seems absurd." 2 Despite this critic's disparaging remarks on the Canadian public's lack of enthusiasm for art, by November 1916 the Canadian War Records Office had already instituted a program to have artists record the war effort with the aim of providing for the Canadian people, "suitable Memorials in the form oftablets, oil-paintings etc., to the Canadian

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)Same topicMathematics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207