"Management is About Coping with Complexity": Concerns of Ontario Pharmacists Regarding Management of the Process of Adapting to Changes in the Scope of Pharmacy Practice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that community pharmacists in Ontario are underutilized health care professionals, especially with respect to medication management and prescribing for patients (Pojskic, McKeigan, Boon Austin, 2014). In December 2009, Ontarioâ s provincial government expanded the scope of pharmacy practice (Ontario Pharmacists Association [OPA], 2014b) to improve access to health care for Ontarians (Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, 2015). Subsequently, pharmacists have been called upon by professional organizations to adopt a patient-centered role. However, many pharmacists in Ontario are encountering challenges to fully adopting the new scope of practice. Using Kotterâ s (1995; Kotter Cohen, 2002) framework of change management, this research aims to identify and describe enablers of and barriers to the process of change in community practice. The findings of this research can further support leaders (regulators, academics, employers, etc.) in the profession to support pharmacists through the change process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it