MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029801616

Litter size affects nest-building behavior in group-housed sows

2023· other· en· W7029801616 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocio-Environmental Systems Modeling · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNew Caledonia Indigenous Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLitterStrawParity (physics)WeaningLarge white
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sows have an innate need for nest-building (NB) before farrowing and a lack of NB can impair parturition. Moreover, in the modern hyperprolific sows, parturitions are challenged by large litters. However, the interpretation of NB behavior in relation to different environments or sow physiology is unclear. Our objective was to observe NB behavior in group farrowing sows that were housed in individual unconfined farrowing pens and abundant straw in a group farrowing unit. The aim was to provide the best indoor substitute for natural farrowing environment, with a total space per sow of 9.6–11.9 m2. We monitored 33 parturitions from five farrowing groups of 7–10 sows on a farm located in western Finland. Sows represented different breeds (Norwegian Landrace and Finnish Landrace × Yorkshire) and parities (parities 1–7, mean parity 3.6 ± 1.8), and with multiparous sows having all farrowed previously in the same environment. Sow behavior was recorded with internet protocol cameras (Niceview NICECAN420WL, Niceview Corp.) for 24 h before birth of the first piglet (BFP) to observe NB (defined as pawing, rooting, arranging, or collecting NB material lasting for at least 5 s). The NB data over the 24 h were analyzed in relation to productivity data (sow parity, litter size, live and stillborn piglets, farrowing duration, and piglet birth weight) using the general linear mixed model (SPSS® program, version 25.0, SPSS® Inc.). Further, NB data was divided in twelve 2 h periods and analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA, including litter size as binomial variable (≤16 piglets vs. >16 piglets) in the model. The NB behavior over 24 h showed a temporal pattern, where average NB 12–0 h before BFP was greater than 24–12 h before BFP (213 ± 95 vs. 52 ± 39 min, p < 0.001). Most activity occurred 8–4 h before BFP, followed by a decrease in activity 4–0 h before BFP. While total NB during 24 h (267 ± 110 min) was unaffected by productivity variables, sows with 17 piglets or more showed increased NB 4–2 h and 2–0 h before farrowing compared to sows with less than 17 piglets (26 ± 7 vs. 50 ± 7 min, p = 0.02, and 11 ± 5 vs. 29 ± 5 min, p = 0.022, respectively). This led a to delayed prepartal decrease in NB activity in sows with large litters. Results support previous findings on the effect of large litters on sow physiology, but it remains unclear whether the increased NB in large litters reflects a negative physiological response or a beneficial effect to compensate for the challenge of this great litter size. Further research should aim at defining different elements of NB in different environments and productivity outcomes. Current results from the novel group farrowing environment highlight the importance of NB in the parturition process, as well as the requirement to follow the consequences of increased litter sizes, while suggesting that a sufficient decrease in NB activity before BFP is a vital element of adequate NB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it