MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030218048

Modification of experimental lower limb ischaemic pain with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

2012· article· en· W7030218048 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQueen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulationTourniquetPlaceboLower limbThreshold of painIschemiaMcGill Pain QuestionnaireIntensity (physics)Randomized controlled trialPain tolerance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)has been shown to be effective for the reduction of experimentally induced ischemic pain in the upper limb. No studies have been published on the effects of TENS for lower limb ischemic pain.
\nObjectives: To investigate the pain-modifying effect of TENS on experimentally induced ischemic pain in the lower limb.
\nMethods: A modified Submaximal Effort Tourniquet Test-induced ischemic pain in the nondominant lower limb of 27 healthy volunteers. Each of the participants completed a baseline modified Submaximal Effort Tourniquet Test (No TENS) and 1 of the experimental conditions: either high-frequency TENS (HF-TENS) or placebo TENS(P-TENS). The outcome measures were the time taken (in seconds) for
\nthe participants to report pain threshold and pain tolerance. Pain endurance was calculated as the difference between these points. Pain intensity during ischemia was assessed using a numerical rating scale.
\nThe McGill Pain Questionnaire recorded participants’ retrospective description of ‘intolerable’ induced pain. The differences in scores between these measures at the baseline and TENS intervention was calculated and used for the analysis.
\nResults: Paired Student t-tests found significant increases in time to pain tolerance and pain endurance in both the TENS groups(P<0.001 HF-TENS and P<0.05 for P-TENS, respectively). When compared with baseline, time to pain threshold increased significantly only with HF-TENS (P<0.01). The independent Student t-tests detected greater increases in pain threshold, tolerance, and endurance in the HF-TENS group compared with the PTENS group (P<0.05, 0.002, and 0.003, respectively). Compared with P-TENS, HF-TENS significantly reduced the pain intensity between the fifth and eigth minutes. Both HF-TENS and P-TENS
\nsignificantly reduced the mean McGill Pain Questionnaire Pain Rating Index scores, but did not show a between-group difference.
\nConclusions: HF-TENS had stronger modifying effects on several aspects of laboratory-induced ischemic pain than did P-TENS. HFTENS delayed the onset of pain, reduced pain levels, and delayed the onset of extreme pain over a period of several mi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQueen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University)Same topicHistorical Studies of British IslesFrench-language works237,207