Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Queen City of Canada's foremost province would find it advantageous to have a City Hall and Court House suited to its important purposes and worthy of our position.Electors of Ontario may well ask themselves why, if the Oity of Toronto is right in spending $1,600,000 for its new city hall and court house, " Canada's foremost province" is not equally justified in an expenditure of hundreds of thousands dollars less in the erection of its Provincial Build- ings.The total cost of the construction of the Toronto City buildings (ex- cluding the cost of site) will be $1,405,000, and contracts have been entered into for all the works except that of plumbing and heating, which is estimated at $80,000.The work covered by Mr. Yorke's contract for the Parliament buildings has been contracted for by the City of Toronto at the sum of $838,000, or at an amount exceeding the contract price of Mr.Yorke of $86,000.It is therefore manifest that the Parliament buildings will cost far less than the Toronto buildings, and competent judges affirm that, when the site of the present old buildings is disposed of, the sum realized will make the entire actual expenditure of the province in respect of its new buildings, not to exceed $250,000.The opponents of the Government allege that Mr. Waite when em- ployed to prepare plans for the building was not limited in the amount of their cost, but the following correspondence to be found in the Sessional Papers of 1887 will shew that he was in the strictest way limited to the Amount of $750,000, then voted by the Legislature :
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.700 | 0.538 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".