MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7030364781

A New Technique for Characterizing Multi-Temperature Convection with Application in Building Energy Simulation

2017· dissertation· en· W7030364781 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsHeat transferConvective heat transferConvectionAdiabatic processIsothermal processBoundary value problemTransfer problemThermalHeat transfer coefficientChurchill–Bernstein equationAdiabatic wall
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glazing systems with attachments such as shades and insect screens are known as complex fenestration systems (CFS). The ASHRAE Window Attachment Tool (ASHWAT) for modeling heat transfer through a CFS are based on a general network of thermal resistors. In these models, convective heat transfer at the indoor side of a CFS with an indoor-mounted attachment is represented by a delta resistor-network. The heat transfer coefficients that characterize this network cannot be calculated using the conventional methods, i.e. based only on the knowledge of the total heat transfer rates at the temperature nodes. Currently, approximate relations based on known limits and experience are used in ASHWAT to estimate the indoor-side convection coefficients. \n \nThe CFS problem is part of the broader class of multi-temperature convection, i.e. problems entailing exclusively isothermal and adiabatic boundary conditions. Driven by the desire to calculate the convection coefficients of the CFS problem with improved accuracy, this thesis is devoted to the study of multi-temperature convection. An extension of the Newton law of cooling is proposed to formulate the multi-temperature convection problem in terms of multiple driving temperature differences. Consequently, the problem is characterized by multiple paired heat transfer coefficients. A technique dubbed dQdT was developed to obtain the paired heat transfer coefficients. The dQdT technique is based on a baseline solution to the full set of governing equations and subsequent solutions to the linearized energy equation with perturbed boundary conditions. dQdT can be implemented in both analytical and numerical solutions. In addition to enabling the extended Newton formulation, the dQdT technique provides a basis for determining the applicability of the resistor-network model to a convection problem. The validity of dQdT was demonstrated in several ways. \n \nThe extended Newton formulation and the dQdT technique were applied to a wide range of convection problems: forced and free convection, internal and external flows, laminar and turbulent flows, hydrodynamically developed and hydrodynamically developing flows, constant- and variable-property flows. The extended Newton formulation was shown to be advantageous compared to the traditional formulation; it leads to a presentation of the solution that is more consistent with the physics of the problem while revealing more detail about the thermal phenomenon. Moreover, using the dQdT results improved correlations for the classical problems of convection in heated annuli and vertical channels were developed. \n \nFinally, the dQdT technique was applied to calculate the heat transfer coefficients of the CFS problem. It was shown that while the current ASHWAT estimates are in good agreement with the dQdT results for a CFS entailing a roller blind, there is a potential for improving the ASHWAT estimates for a CFS entailing a venetian blind. Using dQdT, the convection coefficients of a wide range of CFS configurations can now be accurately calculated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization→French-language works237,207→