Men’s social media stories of Crohn’s disease: A dialogical analysis of three cases
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite distinct sex and gender differences in the presentation and manifestation of Crohn’s disease, little research to date has considered men’s particular experiences. Furthermore, whilst hegemonic masculine ideals have been reported to negatively impact men’s mental and physical health, increasingly research has emphasised that men engage in a diverse and varying range of practices, including those beneficial to health. One such practice is the posting of their illness experiences on social media. Given long-term conditions can lead to a sense of disruption, the flexibility of social media - its ability to multimodally capture fluctuating, everyday aspects of illness - makes it arguably well-suited to capturing chronic illness narratives. The interactive nature of storytelling online means that a dialogical narrative approach, based on a relational epistemology, is particularly useful. Combined with an intrinsic case study methodology, this study therefore asked, “How do men who post publicly on social media author themselves and their experiences of Crohn’s disease?” Three participants were recruited, all of whom had a diagnosis of Crohn’s and posted to both a blog and other social networking sites (SNS) about their illness. Two resided in Canada, and one in the UK. All were white, cis-gendered and in heterosexual relationships. For each participant, two years’ of multimodal social media data was downloaded. After screening, in-depth analysis was conducted using a dialogical narrative approach. Pre-interview summaries were then developed and provided to participants in both written and video format. Follow-up semi-structured interviews took place via video call and further analysis followed. The analyses are presented in six individual chapters, divided into two overarching sections. The social media analyses highlighted the participants’ preferred forms of authorship, the different genres and/or particular configurations of time and space they used, and what this meant in relation to their Crohn’s, as well as the functions of their social media use. In the interview analyses, the participants’ responses to my interpretations were analysed alongside the social media cases. The key findings emphasised the participants’ different responses to the lack of predictability caused by Crohn’s and the resultant impact of this on their lives and embodied experiences; the different ways participants used social media to gain a greater sense of control over their stories and identities, as well as a sense of community; and how the degree of participants’ emotional engagement with both their own experiences and with others on their social media provided important insights into the interaction between masculine identities and illness. Finally, the study appealed to a consideration of how such novel methods may be utilised in future research and within therapeutic contexts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it