MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030417458

Men’s social media stories of Crohn’s disease: A dialogical analysis of three cases

2023· dissertation· en· W7030417458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Roles and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDialogical selfNarrativeSocial mediaPresentation (obstetrics)StorytellingNarrative inquiryFlexibility (engineering)Discourse analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite distinct sex and gender differences in the presentation and manifestation of Crohn’s disease, little research to date has considered men’s particular experiences. Furthermore, whilst hegemonic masculine ideals have been reported to negatively impact men’s mental and physical health, increasingly research has emphasised that men engage in a diverse and varying range of practices, including those beneficial to health. One such practice is the posting of their illness experiences on social media. Given long-term conditions can lead to a sense of disruption, the flexibility of social media - its ability to multimodally capture fluctuating, everyday aspects of illness - makes it arguably well-suited to capturing chronic illness narratives. The interactive nature of storytelling online means that a dialogical narrative approach, based on a relational epistemology, is particularly useful. Combined with an intrinsic case study methodology, this study therefore asked, “How do men who post publicly on social media author themselves and their experiences of Crohn’s disease?” Three participants were recruited, all of whom had a diagnosis of Crohn’s and posted to both a blog and other social networking sites (SNS) about their illness. Two resided in Canada, and one in the UK. All were white, cis-gendered and in heterosexual relationships. For each participant, two years’ of multimodal social media data was downloaded. After screening, in-depth analysis was conducted using a dialogical narrative approach. Pre-interview summaries were then developed and provided to participants in both written and video format. Follow-up semi-structured interviews took place via video call and further analysis followed. The analyses are presented in six individual chapters, divided into two overarching sections. The social media analyses highlighted the participants’ preferred forms of authorship, the different genres and/or particular configurations of time and space they used, and what this meant in relation to their Crohn’s, as well as the functions of their social media use. In the interview analyses, the participants’ responses to my interpretations were analysed alongside the social media cases. The key findings emphasised the participants’ different responses to the lack of predictability caused by Crohn’s and the resultant impact of this on their lives and embodied experiences; the different ways participants used social media to gain a greater sense of control over their stories and identities, as well as a sense of community; and how the degree of participants’ emotional engagement with both their own experiences and with others on their social media provided important insights into the interaction between masculine identities and illness. Finally, the study appealed to a consideration of how such novel methods may be utilised in future research and within therapeutic contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it