MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7030431294

Nombres/personajes del exilio republicano en Chile: Winnipeg — ¿Va al paraíso? —Riñihue/Valdivia

2025· article· en· W7030431294 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanish Civil WarPort (circuit theory)Product (mathematics)Work (physics)Chose
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From an interdisciplinary view, this work aims to give three perspectives to approach the migratory phenomenon of exile in Chile, as a product of the Spanish Civil War. The first, called “Winnipeg”, will refer mainly to the prowess between the Chilean and Republican exiles. Its main characters are the poet Pablo Neruda and the president Pedro Aguirre Cerda. The second, called “Va al paraíso?”, is inspired by the city of Valparaíso, the port where Winnipeg arrived. “Va al paraíso?” will have a sense of where we are going... and if the arrival to this city-port is landing in a hypothetical paradise. Can a new life on another continent be as in paradise? Thirdly, baptized as “Riñihue/Valdivia”, we will turn to a town and a lake of the same name in southern Chile: Riñihue. It is a community that is very close to the city of Valdivia, and that it is the pole where one of the most violent cataclysms, ever registered in the history of humanity. Leopoldo Castedo —who arrived in Valparaíso exiled in Winnipeg— made the only known documentary, linked to this powerful telluric movement: earthquake and tidal wave.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)→Same topicCultural and Social Studies in Latin America→French-language works237,207→