MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030436700

#NIGeothermalWeek: Defining the vision for geothermal energy in Northern Ireland

2022· report· en· W7030436700 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · 2022
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersBritish Geological SurveyDepartment for the Economy
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DiafiltrationDysgeusiaLiquationEmperipolesisDurvalumabTriacetin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Northern Ireland Geothermal Energy Week (#NIGeothermalWeek) was held between June 13th – 17th 2022 at Riddel Hall, Queen’s Management School, Queen’s University Belfast. This inaugural event for the geothermal community in Northern Ireland could not have been more timely. The backcloth of geopolitical events – Northern Ireland Climate Act legislation mandating action on net zero targets, geopolitical conflict on the edge of the European Union leading to energy insecurity and strong inflationary pressures – has produced a window of opportunity for accelerating energy market transitions. <br/>Northern Ireland Geothermal Energy Week inspired, energised and focused attention. Under the stewardship of the Department for the Economy (DfE) and the Geological Survey of Northern Ireland (GSNI), and in partnership with Queen’s University Belfast, it provided policy makers, industry and research communities with the opportunity to come together, and create the conditions for defining the vision for the future of geothermal energy in Northern Ireland. <br/>Underpinned by the themes of partnership and inclusion, NI Geothermal Energy Week elicited the international experiences and insights from the International Geothermal Trade Associations; International Geothermal Association (IGA) – International, European Geothermal Energy Council (EGEC) - European Union, and Geothermal Rising (formally Geothermal Resources Council, GRC) - USA. This dialogue took place on the opening stakeholder day. Further to this, an awareness-and understanding-building public webinar with an expert panel, sought to highlight how geothermal energy outcomes can deliver to all communities across Northern Ireland.<br/>Working together across the week and agreeing the way forward yielded important insight for defining a vision for geothermal energy in Northern Ireland; revolving around communities, people, customers, environment, investment and operations. This cocreated vision aligns with the NI 10X economic vision, the World Energy Council’s energy trilemma vision, local geology as well as geothermal energy sensory experiences for heating and cooling. <br/>Northern Ireland Geothermal Energy Week was rich with information, social engagement and network encounter feedback. Taking stock, some things we learn from this inaugural event, not least with the survey feedback indicating perceptions of knowledge increasing, improving attitudes towards geothermal and reassuring points on the event organisation and a strong willingness to attend further geothermal sector events for organising and galvanising action. This report and reporting practice helps support industrial policy evaluation. It also showcases aesthetic innovation processes of sensory and evaluative forms of policymaking practice. Significantly too, this vision-making practice shifts the geological vocabulary towards a wider business sectoral understanding.<br/>Looking forward, the challenge now is to commission, run and deliver demonstration geothermal projects, showcasing their results to the general public with a simple geothermal value proposition, while also cocreating a roadmap to deliver our future geothermal vision for Northern Ireland. We believe that this vision reflects an emerging shift towards a lingua franca for building the geothermal sector.<br/>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast)Same topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207