MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7030504884

Non-invasive in-ovo sexing of chicken eggs using Raman spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging

2022· other· en· W7030504884 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueSocio-Environmental Systems Modeling · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexingHyperspectral imagingCullingDigital imagingRadiomicsRaman spectroscopy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to meet the demand for consumption eggs, billions of specially bred layer chickensare hatched every year. Serving no purpose in the industry, over 420 million one day oldmale chicks are culled every year in Europe. Current, accurate (>95%) commercial in-ovosexing techniques are unfit for sexing before day 9 of incubation (E9) and their invasivenature imposes a risk for bacterial infection. With upcoming new legislation aiming tooutlaw the culling of chicken embryos after E7, there is an urgent need for thedevelopment of non-invasive early in-ovo chicken sexing methods. Reports relying onspectroscopy techniques have been abundant in recent years, yet relatively few have beendemonstrated in practice. The most compelling of the explored research techniques relieson the analysis of extraembryonic blood vessels using Raman and fluorescencespectroscopies, enabling sexing with good accuracy at E4 without disrupting the eggmembranes. Other researchers turned to machine vision to determine blood vesselgeometry from conventional photographs to perform in-ovo sexing with good accuracy atE4. Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) has the potential for commercial deployment of in-ovosexing, as texture analysis of HSI in the near-infrared can facilitate sexing with excellentaccuracy, even before incubation. While these techniques have indisputable potential in inovosexing, most of these efforts failed to meet the high standards for sexing accuracy,while others were faced insurmountable challenges during upscaling or when generalizingtheir approach to other breeds. This PhD project envisions the determination of spectralsex-specific digital biomarkers in the eggshell using Raman imaging complementary tovisible-light HSI in enabling early and accurate non-invasive in-ovo sexing. Initialidentification of novel biomarkers in white and brown eggs will be performedusing Raman and elaborate chemometric analysis with sex determined using PCR asthe cross-validation method. Likewise, informative spectral, morphological and texturalfeatures will distinctively be identified in HSI data obtained for the same eggs. State of theart data fusion strategies will be employed to expedite joint analysis and training ofclassification algorithms on Raman imaging and HSI data for in-ovo sexing. Digitalbiomarker model evaluated by deep learning approaches as a tool will be explored as partof this PhD project in the screening for early detection of sex in the eggs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocio-Environmental Systems ModelingFrench-language works237,207