MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7031692279

Kolumba Museum

2007· other· en· W7031692279 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlchemyDeskGlobeSubject (documents)Window (computing)Quarter (Canadian coin)Adventure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scholar, wearing cap and robe, standing between chair and writing table, holding pen in right hand, on which he is leaning against table, left hand placed on chair, looking without fright in direction of vision, parallel with and before glass window, consisting of shining disk, containing in its guartered center monogram of Christ, INRI, surrounded by two concentric circles with inscription: Adam te dageram (inner band); Amrtet algar algastina (outer band); round mirror, almost perpendicular to window, toward whose lower left area forefinger of right hand, of apparition concealed by disk, points; behind mirror, vague, almost obliterated, anthropomorphic shape, partly covering window frame; on desk, papers, small book; globe before desk at right foreground; at left background, bundle of folded papers hanging by window; shelves on wall containing skull and books.The subject of the etching is disputed, hence the various titles proposed: Dr. Faustus ( Faust in His Study ), The Practicing Alchemist , Scholar in His Study . Rosenberg writes that the term alchemist should not be taken in too narrow a sense. In the artist's time various scholarly and pseudo-scholarly activities such as astrology, medicine, cabalistic art, and theurgy were connected with alchemy and often practiced by the same person. Bojanowski (cited by Van De Waal in OH ) writes that the etching shows a practicing alchemist, a pansophist, an adept of some sect.Rosenberg writes that the etching shows a scholar, a higher type of spiritual alchemist, at the moment when he experiences a religious vision. He had been deep in his work, yet the interruption has not startled him. The disc, object of the vision, has a general resemblance to the magic circles found in contemporary conjuring books, and its religious character is indicated by the clearly defined monogram of Christ in its center. Attempts have been made to decipher the lettering on the disc. Rotermund (cited by Van De Waal) emends the inscription to read: "Tetragrammaton, King; thou art mighty forever; Adonai, Theos, Omnipotent, thou art mighty forever." The inscription is identical with that of an amulet at the time. These amulets invoke the name of God in different languages and were believed to give protection to those wearing them.Boon writes that the artist has taken the Cabalistic anagram on the luminous disk from an amulet to which magic power was ascribed. Moreover, in the practice of magic, the mirror at which Faust is looking signifies the hidden side of the world. This mirror is pointed out to Faust by an apparition emanating from but concealed by the radiant disk. The artist's neighbor Samuel Menasseh ben Israel was deeply interested in the occult. Van De Waal suggests that the etching is an idealized portrait of the Socinian Faustus Socinus (d.1604), shown contemplating Christ, the only man to have been admitted to the center of the one and only God.; |Robed and capped scholar standing before table, bent slightly forward, head turned toward vision of radiant disk appearing before glass window; in C of disk, INRI, surrounded by 2 concentric circles; next to disk, round mirror toward which forefinger of apparition points; books, papers, globe, skull on table and around room.; |The etching by the Dutch painter, draughtsman, and etcher Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn (1606-69) is generally dated ca. 1650-53.;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4720.229

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Mathematical Theories and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207