MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7032968367

Oportunidad de negocio en el mercado chino para incrementar la exportación peruana de arándanos frescos de la región La Libertad

2014· dissertation· en· W7032968367 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLogistics and Infrastructure Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaCompetition (biology)Business opportunityProduct (mathematics)TariffInternational marketProduction (economics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT \nThis thesis report entitled "BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CHINESE MARKET FOR INCREASING THE PERUVIAN EXPORT OF LA LIBERTAD FRESH BLUEBERRY” has the purpose make know the business opportunity to companies and institutions that want to venture or diversify into a new market, knowing that the China market is highly attractive for the sale of blueberries. \n \nThis research project arises in view: the growing demand for blueberries and little competition in China regarding healthy products with high nutritional value, also found in blueberries as one of the crops with the greatest potential for the future, because this is a nontraditional fruit highly prized in the international markets due to its properties and characteristics. \n \nThe thesis highlighted that Peru has competitive advantages compared with other countries. Peru not only has the land and climate variability that is needed for the production of cranberries, but also has the ability to offer off-season, many markets like the U.S., CANADA CHILE and ARGENTINA SPAIN, so there is space for expansion. Additionally, it was made a market research about blueberries in China 2009-2013 in which the product got showed and analyzed, and tariff situation, requirements and \nbarriers. \n \nFinally, it was concluded that the business opportunities of the Chinese market will positively influence increasing Blueberries Peruvian exports in subsequent years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicLogistics and Infrastructure AnalysisFrench-language works237,207