MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7032980794

Orphans in Society: A Comparative Study of Gender Differences in Selected Works of Childrén's Literature (1876-1911)

2018· dissertation· en· W7032980794 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdventureReading (process)Context (archaeology)Identity (music)WizardCharacter (mathematics)Order (exchange)Adaptation (eye)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thesis examines different representations of literary orphans in a selection of books for children published between 1879 and 1911. The four chosen texts are Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Tom Sawyer (1876), J. M. Barrie’s Peter and Wendy (1911), L. Frank Baum’s The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (1900), and Frances Hodgson Burnett’s The Secret Garden (1910). The study looks at significant gender differences in the process of the orphan’s adaptation to his/her social environment. It also shows how orphans turn their miseries into actions and how they serve their society when they are given the opportunity. The selected texts are going to be analysed according to a gender-based comparison and close reading of the journeys taken by their male and female heroes in order to prove themselves in society. There is a deep analysis of the character of the orphan taking into account three criteria: The orphan’s adaptation to the foster family and relationship with other characters (not members of the foster family), the orphan’s search for identity, and the orphan’s adaptation to the physical and cultural surrounding. These criteria are discussed according to three different approaches: ethics of care, social identity and the role of the setting.
\n
\nThe results of this study will show whether there are significant gender differences in the way the orphan characters of the selected novels behave regarding their family, friends, their domestic environments, and in the way they forge their identity. Given the socio-historical context of the chosen novels, it is to be expected that orphan heroes should tend to be better care receivers than care givers, and rely on female characters to provide that care. It is also to be expected that they tend to be less emotional and better at exerting leadership than their female counterparts, while, concerning their relationship with “home”, one can expect that they are not ready to adapt unless they find the care and attention they need. In contrast to male orphans, we expect to find orphan heroines that excel at being care givers, even when they are in dire need of care themselves. At the same time, taking into account contemporary discourses concerning female education and position in the family, it should not be surprising if home was almost automatically connected with motherhood and domesticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it