Perspektiven der laserassistierten Keratoplastik
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: This article provides a review of the current state of laser-assisted keratoplasty and describes a first proof of concept study to test the feasibility of a new mid-infrared (MIR) picosecond laser to perform applanation-free corneal trephination. Methods: The procedure is based on a specially adapted laser system (PIRL-HP2-1064 OPA-3000, Attodyne, Canada) which works with a wavelength of 3,000 ± 90 nm, a pulse duration of 300 ps and a repetition rate of 1 kHz. The picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) beam is delivered to the sample by a custom-made optics system with an implemented scanning mechanism. Corneal specimens were mounted on an artificial anterior chamber and subsequent trephination was performed with the PIRL under stable intraocular pressure conditions. Results: A defined corneal ablation pattern, e.g. circular, linear, rectangular or disc-shaped, can be selected and its specific dimensions are defined by the user. Circular and linear ablation patterns were employed for the incisions in this study. Linear and circular penetrating PIRL incisions were examined by macroscopic inspection, histology, confocal microscopy and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) for characterization of the incisional quality. Using PIRL reproducible and stable incisions could be made in human and porcine corneal samples with minimal damage to the surrounding tissue. Conclusion: The PIRL laser radiation in the mid-infrared spectrum with a wavelength of 3 μm is exactly tuned to one of the dominant vibrational excitation bands of the water molecule, serves as an effective tool for applanation-free corneal incision and might broaden the armamentarium of corneal transplant surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".