Partners in the Parks: Field Guide to an Experiential Program in the National Parks (Second Edition)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents Dedication: The National Park ServiceJerry Herron and Hallie SavageAcknowledgmentsAbout the Authors ForewordHeather Thiessen-ReilyMessage from the Co-Chairs of the Partners in the Parks CommitteeKathleen King and Bill AtwillKing’s CanyonEmily Blair CHAPTER 1 A Ranger’s WelcomeConnie RuddField NotesUnexpected Discoveries at the Black Canyon of the GunnisonNational Park (Dana Reid) CHAPTER 2 Origin and EvolutionHeather Thiessen-Reily and Joan DigbyField NotesBuilding for the Future (Dalton Dorrell) CHAPTER 3 Stepping into the WildHeather Thiessen-Reily and Joan DigbyField NotesThe Unexpected Wilderness of Sequoia National Park(Johnny MacLean, Brian White, and Alysia Schmidt)Defining Wilderness (Josh LaMore) CHAPTER 4 Urban Landscapes Joan Digby and Heather Thiessen-ReilyField NotesFrom Fire Island to Gateway: Evolution of an Urban Partners in the Parks (Melissa Antinori and James P. Clarke) CHAPTER 5 Expanding Horizons Closer to HomeHeather Thiessen-Reily and Joan DigbyField NotesImmersion in Nature—Quite Literally: U.S. Virgin Islands(Joan Digby with Kathleen Nolan and Kristy Biolsi) CHAPTER 6 Partnerships and Process: A Step-by-Step Guide toInitiating a PITP ProgramHeather Thiessen-Reily and Joan DigbyField NotesPartnerships in the Park: Building a Community in OlympicNational Park (Alison Mills Willis, Laura Harrington, and Brook Kelly) CHAPTER 7 Gearing UpHeather Thiessen-Reily and Joan DigbyField NotesEverglades 2013/2014: Slogging through the Slough and OtherFavorite Experiences (Kathleen King) CHAPTER 8 Group Soup and Creature DiscomfortsJoan Digby and Heather Thiessen-ReilyField NotesOn Top of the World: Backpacking in the Sierra Nevada Mountains (Chloe Margulis) CHAPTER 9 Preparing, Experiencing, and Assessing LearningHeather Thiessen-Reily and Joan DigbyField NotesPartners in the Parks: An Adventure in the Black Canyon Comes Home (Anjelica Harlow) APPENDICESA. Partners in the Parks Programs to DateB. PITP Service-Learning ProjectsC. Partners in the Parks Best Practices ManualD. Sample Project Proposal and Final Budget ReportE. Letter and Application for Academic Fee WaiverF. Key to Animal Tracks in the Field NotesAbout the NCHC Monograph Series
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.133 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".