PERBEDAAN PENGARUH PENAMBAHAN \nLATIHAN ISOTONIC QUADRICEPS PADA \nULTRASOUND TERHADAP PENINGKATAN \nKEMAMPUAN FUNGSIONAL PENDERITA \nOSTEOARTHRITIS KNEE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTISARI \nLatar Belakang : Aktivitas fisik yang kurang ditambah dengan kelebihan berat \nbadan berpotensi menimbulkan pembebanan sendi yang semakin besar, khususnya \npada sendi lutut. Kondisi ini akan bertambah parah bila terjadi pada usia lanjut, \ndimana telah terjadi perubahan hormonal yang memicu percepatan proses degenerasi \nstruktur persendian. Degenerasi sendi ini merupakan salah satu manifestasi klinis \ndari penyakit osteoarthritis. Tujuan : Mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan pengaruh \npenambahan latihan isotonic quadriceps pada ultrasound terhadap peningkatan \nkemampuan fungsional penderita osteoarthritis knee. Metode : Menggunakan \nmetode Eksperiment, yang menggunakan desain penelitian two group pre-test posttest \ndesign, \neskperimen \n1 \ndiberikan \nperlakuan \nultrasound \ndan \neksperimen \n2 \ndiberikan \n \nperlakuan \n \npenambahan latihan isotonic quadriceps dan ultrasound. Subyek \npenelitian ini adalah penderita yang memiliki keluhan Osteoarthritis knee yang \ndipilih menggunakan tehnik Random. Intervensi ultrasound dilakukan selama 10 \nmenit, dilakukan 2 kali perminggu selama 3 minggu sedangkan intervensi isotonic \nquadriceps dilakukan 3 kali perminggu selama 2 minggu. Alat ukur pada penelitian \nini adalah Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) \nindex. Hasil : Hasil uji hipotesis I menggunakan paired samples t-test diperoleh nilai \np : 0,001 (p<0,05). Hasil uji hipotesis II menggunakan paired samples t-test \ndiperoleh nilai p : 0,000 (p<0,05). Dan hasil uji hipotesis III menggunakan \nindependent sample t-test diperoleh nilai p : 0,000 (p<0,05). Kesimpulan : Terdapat \nperbedaan pengaruh antara penambahan latihan isotonic quadriceps pada ultrasound \nterhadap peingkatan kemampuan peningkatan kemampuan fungsional penderita \nosteoarthritis knee. Saran : Di sarankan untuk menambah jumlah responden dan \nmemperpanjang waktu penelitian, sehingga dapat diketahui keefektifitasan dari \nultrasound dan latihan isotonic quadriceps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".