MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7033304927

Rekindling the Flame: An Exploration of the Relationships Between Health, Culture and Place Among Urban First Nations Men Living in London, Ontario

2017· article· en· W7033304927 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticipatory action researchIndigenousCitizen journalismPhotovoicePublic healthPerceptionQualitative researchTraditional knowledgeSocial determinants of health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this dissertation, I present the findings of a community-based participatory research project with the Southwest Ontario Aboriginal Health Access Centre (SOAHAC). Embracing a decolonizing methodology that draws upon strengths-based and intersectional approaches, I qualitatively explore the relationships between health, culture and place among urban First Nations men living in the city of London, Ontario.\nIndigenous cultures are broadly defined as a “systems of belief, values, customs, and traditions that are transmitted from generation to generation through teachings, ecological knowledge and time-honoured land-based practices” (McIvor & Napoleon, p. 6). Culture is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of Indigenous health and well-being. Yet the processes by which this relationship occurs have not been critically explored among urban First Nations men. It is precisely these processes that I seek to explore within this dissertation as my overarching research question.\nPresented as a series of manuscripts, this dissertation has four research objectives:\n1) To explore meanings of health among urban First Nations men living in London, Ontario;\n2) To explore perceptions of culture among urban First Nations men living in London, Ontario;\n3) To explore the relationship between health and culture among urban First Nations men living in London, Ontario;\n4) To explore the benefits and challenges of working within a cross-cultural research relationship within a community-based participatory research project.\nThe theoretical objectives of this research draw upon conversations with 13 urban First Nations men. Within these conversations, social connection, land and culture are identified as important determinants of wholistic health and well-being, particularly through their ability to provide a sense of belonging. These determinants and the experiences of belonging within them are intricately connected to the men’s traditional territories and reserve communities, and profoundly shaped by historical and ongoing processes of colonization. Colonial processes are further found to have created an uneasy relationship between the men and their cultures. This is exemplified by experiences of culture change, racism, and lateral violence that challenge the men’s ability to practice their cultures.\nThe methodological objective of this dissertation is explored in a manuscript co-written with Erik Mandawe, a First Nations research assistant hired to contribute to the decolonizing approach of this thesis. In this manuscript, we discuss the importance of relationships made within the research processes, and how these relationships contributed to our personal stories of reconciliation.\nI conclude this dissertation with a discussion of its major contributions, framed by four consistent themes within the theoretical and methodological findings: colonization, sense of belonging, intersectionality, and reconciliation. I propose that the space within which these themes converge provides a valuable lens to apply to research that explores the relationships between health, culture and place among urban First Nations men.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicPluripotent Stem Cells Research→French-language works237,207→