MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033344031

The prevalence, determinants, natural history and impact of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in patients with tuberculosis pericarditis - insights from the IMPI trial

2016· dissertation· en· W7033344031 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSouth African Medical Research Council
KeywordsAtrial fibrillationTuberculous pericarditisPericarditisNatural historyAtrial flutterTuberculosisDiseaseSinus rhythm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tuberculosis is the most common cause of pericarditis in Africa. The dual human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-tuberculosis epidemics are major contributors to the burden of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis, including tuberculous pericarditis. Mortality rates remain unacceptably high. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. It is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, as well as complications related to thromboembolic disease and haemodynamic instability. Similarly, atrial flutter (AFL) is a common macro-reentry arrhythmia, often associated with AF and its complications. While there is a recognized association between atrial fibrillation and / or atrial flutter (AF/AFL) and tuberculous pericarditis, there are limited data regarding the prevalence, determinants, natural history, and outcomes of AF/AFL in tuberculous pericarditis. Hypothesis: In patients with tuberculous pericarditis, AF/AFL is common, and when compared to tuberculous pericarditis patients that are in sinus rhythm, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Aims In participants with tuberculous pericarditis enrolled into the Investigation of the Management of Pericarditis (IMPI) trial, we intend to: 1. Estimate the prevalence of AF/AFL 2. Describe the natural history of AF/AFL 3. Identify clinical, biochemical and, echocardiographic predictors of AF/AFL 4. Determine the clinical impact of AF/AFL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)Same topicPericarditis and Cardiac TamponadeFrench-language works237,207