MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033347005

Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Family Accommodation in Pediatric Obsessive– Compulsive Disorder

2023· article· en· W7033347005 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccommodationDistressPath analysis (statistics)Functional impairmentAnalysis of varianceEmotional distress
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects 1-3% of children and adolescents and can profoundly impact their daily functioning. Family accommodation (FA) is defined as actions taken by parents or other family members to accommodate OCD symptoms by temporarily alleviating distress or impairment. However, in the long run, FA can contribute to the maintenance of OCD symptoms by interfering with corrective learning and habituation. The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of FA and investigate the factors influencing FA in a large sample of Scandinavian children and adolescents (N-238). FA was assessed using the Family Accommodation Scale (FAS), a 12-item clinician-rated interview. Several other assessments were used to assess OCD severity, OCD-related functional impairment, as well as internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Results showed that approximately 70% of primary caregivers reported daily accommodation, while 98% reported it occurring at least once a week. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that age, OCD severity, OCD-related functional impairment, as well as higher internalizing and externalizing symptoms, were specifically associated with the FAS total score. The model accounted for 30.6% of the variance of the total FAS score (F(6, 162) = 23,125.763, p < 0.001)). FAS scores were positively correlated with contamination/cleaning symptoms (r=0.21, p < 0.001), but not with the harm/sexual symptoms (r=−0.07, p=0.152) or symmetry/hoarding symptoms (r=0.05, p=0.280). A path analysis revealed that FA partially mediated the relationship of OCD severity and externalizing symptoms with functional impairment, and fully mediated the relationship between age and functional impairment. The results highlight the role of FA in the progression of OCD and related symptoms. It is recommended to emphasize the need for evaluating FA before initiating OCD treatment and addressing it as necessary during treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207