MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033463292

Plectosphaerella cucuminera: a potential bioherbicide for Cirsium arvense

2020· article· en· W7033463292 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos, Complexity, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirsium arvenseBioherbicideWeedBiological pest controlPastureConidiumFungal diseaseGreenhouse
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plectosphaerella cucuminera, a fungal pathogen of several plant species globally, has recently been confirmed as a naturally-occurring disease-causing agent in Cirsium arvense in pastures in New Zealand. To explore its potential as a bio-herbicide, five green-house/growth-cabinet experiments were conducted between 2006 and 2013, two in New Zealand and three in Canada (the latter comparing Canadian and New Zealand isolates). A sixth experiment, in a pasture in New Zealand, provided “proof-of-concept” using the New Zealand isolate. The fungus defoliated C. arvense plants under both the greenhouse and field conditions when applied at 1013 conidia ha-1 in water volumes ranging from 250-1500 L ha-1. Disease levels were highest with multiple applications of conidia, the addition of Pulse wetting agent, temperatures around 20°C and 48 h leaf wetness following application. Isolates of P. cucuminera obtained from C. arvense both in New Zealand and Canada caused similar levels of disease under a range of environmental conditions indicating a global opportunity for its development as a bio-herbicide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicChaos, Complexity, and EducationFrench-language works237,207