Processo orçamentário e revolta parlamentar na terra do hockey : á procura do equilíbrio entre a eficiência e controle no Canadá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary objective of this work is to investigate the degree of success of the Parliamentary Budget Officer -PBO, an autonomous bureaucratic post created in Canada in 2006 in order to restore the balance between the strong government and the weak Parliament in the budgetary realm.Based on the methodology suggested by the new institutionalism, which emphasizes the role of institutional structures in determining political results, this dissertation seeks to understand the causes underlying the emergence of the PBO, the possibilities and limits of its mandate, and its real contribution to strengthening direct parliamentary oversight of financial activities carried out by the prime minister and his cabinet.It was concluded in the end that, in the form proposed, the reform of the PBO was a response to the wishes of the Conservative Government itself, which lacked electoral legitimacy and professional oversight.In addition, it is noted that the new agency did not generate the results expected with respect to the Parliament, although it did create a certain legitimacy for itself during Stephen Harper's minority governments.In this context, we propose that future reforms geared towards strengthening parliamentary financial oversight seek to expand Parliament's direct participation in the decision-making process, whether by means of expanding its access to the cabinet or by strengthening parliamentary procedures so that a career in the Legislature will be attractive in and of itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".