MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033501083

Right to be Healthy

2014· article· en· W7033501083 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture, Art, Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Falling (accident)Public healthMinor (academic)Public interestSocial responsibilityPublic policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Right to be Healthy Canadians were startled, recently, to hear that medical boards had to reject as physically unfit about 50% of the young men who wished to join the armed forces ... A few years ago a sample study was made of over 3,000 school children in Manitoba, and 70% of them were suffering from physical defects.There were many minor ailments, but some of the children had very serious conditions which were not being cared for . . .Every year workers lose $50,000,000 in wages and industry loses $75,000,000 in pro- duction because of illness . . .We are worried about our falling birth rate, but in the past ten years we lost an average of 15,000 children under the age of 1, each year.Many more facts could be given to show the wastage of human life which is going on in our country.The public has become more conscious of this and has pressed in many ways for new developments.Farmer, labour, and medical organizations have all drawn up plans for a better health programme for this country.Because of all this interest and the public demands, the government has drawn up a draft bill for health insurance.HEALTH AS A SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY But why social responsibility for health?Why should the government enter the field of health?There are a number of reasons advanced in support of health insurance.First is a recognition of the increasing cost of adequate medical care.As medical science has developed over the years, there has been a tremendous increase in specialization, diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, surgical skills, hospital facilities.All this has meant that we can save more lives, but at a much higher cost.A serious illness at the present time can be so expensive as to shatter for years the budget of even a moderately well-to-do family.The majority of Canadians simply cannot meet the risk of illness.Many of these people, however, could meet sickness costs if they were spread out over their working years by a small payment every month or every year.And this is the essence of health insurance, small regular payments and the state assuming responsibility for the payments the lowest-income groups cannot afford to make.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it