MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7033517862

The risk of women in Manitoba acquiring pelvic inflammatory disease from one or more episodes of genital Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections

2004· dissertation· en· W7033517862 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGonorrheaChlamydiaPelvic inflammatory diseaseSexually transmitted diseaseDiseaseIncidence (geometry)PopulationChlamydia trachomatis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The association between being infected with the sexually transmitted infections (STIs), Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae and developing pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is supported in the literature. Research also demonstrates an association between repeat infections with chlamydia or gonorrhea and acquiring PID. While there is some information from Canada on this topic, the majority of the research is from the United States and abroad. Additionally, there are few studies that have been able to examine the risk of acquiring PID utilizing a prospective study design. The purpose of this study is to identify the risk of women in Manitoba acquiring PID from one or more episodes of genital chlamydia or gonorrhea. The length of time following a genital chlamydial or gonococcal infection where PID develops is explored. Obtaining information on the risks of acquiring PID, among women in Manitoba with genital chlamydia or gonorrhea, has important policy implications such as early detection and screening of STIs, treatment procedures, partner notification and contact tracing. A surveillance system framework was used to guide the study. The data were acquired by linking administrative databases from Cadham Provincial Laboratory and Manitoba Health. Three cohorts of women were chosen, based on their history of testing positive or negative for STIs. Quantitative data analysis was completed through the use of the Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) program. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions were completed for each variable to become familiar with the data. Since this is a cohort study, incidence rates and measures of association, such as the relative risk, were completed. Tests of statistical significance were also calculated. Study findings indicate that l5 - 24 year old women, in Manitoba with documented infections of genital...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicReproductive tract infections research→French-language works237,207→