MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033615726

Reflection seismic indicators for submarine permafrost and gas hydrate distributions on the Canadian Arctic Beaufort Shelf

2021· other· en· W7033615726 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHelmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostClathrate hydrateArcticSubaerialSubmarine pipelineSubmarineBeaufort seaReflection (computer programming)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the last glaciation the Canadian Arctic Beaufort Shelf is subjected to marine transgression. From subaerial mean annual temperatures during terrestrial exposure of ≤ -20°C, thermal conditions changed up to present submarine bottom water temperatures near -1°C. While conditions during the Pliocene favoured extensive formation of permafrost and gas hydrates, present occurrences are exposed to degradation due to the warmer climate. Today, submerged offshore permafrost is still responding to this thermal change. Ongoing degradation creates the potential of methane release of previously trapped biogenic gas within the relic permafrost and from gas hydrate dissociation. The mobilisation of methane and its possible release to the atmosphere plays a significant role in climate change. Yet, both the extent of permafrost and underlying gas hydrates is still poorly known. Here, we present seismic indicators for offshore permafrost and gas hydrates in 2D multichannel reflection seismic data acquired in the Canadian Beaufort Sea. Seismic lines that run from the shallow shelf towards deeper water show layer-crossing reflections that become gradually shallower towards the north-west into deeper water. These reflections show an amplitude-varying characteristic and are phase-reversed. We first use shot gathers from a synthetic model based on the field seismic acquisition characteristics and borehole geophysical data to verify our general ability to detect permafrost-and gas hydrate-related reflections. The synthetic data were processed using the same data processing applied to the field data and reveal clear top and base of permafrost and gas hydrate reflections. With this encouraging result, we can exclude any potentially misleading processing artefacts in the field seismic data. We interpret the amplitude-varying, phase-reversed and layer-crossing reflections seen in the field data as seismic indicators for the base of permafrost and base of gas hydrates. In contrast to the synthetic data, top of permafrost and top of gas hydrates are not clearly identified in the field data. However, additional seismic indicators support the interpretation of the presence of permafrost including attenuation of acoustic penetration and velocity pull-up effects at presumably horizontal strata. Furthermore, strong amplitude variations beneath the current base of gas hydrates and bright spots indicate trapped free gas accumulations from possible previously dissociated gas hydrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207