MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033644978

Raising a Question Mark: Disability and Textual Recalibration in Canadian Fiction and Film

2019· dissertation· W7033644978 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2019
Typedissertation
Language
FieldChemistry
TopicChemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQueerDepictionDisability studiesNarrativeScholarshipAmbivalenceQueer theoryManifestoInclusion (mineral)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study considers how the disabled child is alternately depicted as a question mark of uncertain form and value and as a prosthetic aid to narrative in Canadian fiction and film. Since Lee Edelman’s manifesto against “reproductive futurism” in 2004’s No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive, children have been the site of discursive debates about the future in queer theory and beyond. Drawing on disability studies scholarship about literature, this thesis positions the disabled child at the frontier of these discursive debates about what viable lives can be projected into the future. Examining depictions of the disabled child in twentieth- and twenty-first-century Canadian fiction and film, I argue that disabled children are chimeric figures who both facilitate and disrupt narratives of generation and inheritance. The disabled child, I show, glances back on a preceding generation’s yearnings and malfeasances while giving shape to a future that is often frightening but is nevertheless charged with ambivalent potential. My first chapter highlights the depiction of arrested adults frozen in childhood by physical and cognitive disabilities in Irene Baird’s Waste Heritage (1938) and Hugh MacLennan’s Barometer Rising (1941), novels about the state’s relationship to the vulnerable citizens under its custodial powers. My second chapter examines how Margaret Laurence’s The Diviners (1974) and Joy Kogawa’s Obasan (1981) focus their critical gaze on the state’s violent dereliction of care toward its vulnerable citizens through the precarious figure of the racialized disabled child who embodies either a redemptive or an impaired future. In chapter three I examine how the long hand of the state extends into physicians and families in texts since the 1990s, proposing that Barbara Gowdy’s short story “Sylvie” (1992) and Kathleen Winter’s novel Annabel (2010) privilege the singularity of disabled children despite medical interventions to police them. Finally, chapter four evaluates science fiction and horror as capacious generic venues to think about the polysemous nature of the disabled child, juxtaposing David Cronenberg’s film The Fly (1986) and Vincenzo Natali’s Splice (2010) to show how eugenic anxieties about disability are simultaneously past, present, and future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicChemistry and Stereochemistry StudiesFrench-language works237,207