MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033718629

Report of the Working Group on North Atlantic Salmon [Québec City, Canada, 12- 22 April, 1999]

2012· report· hr· W7033718629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) · 2012
Typereport
Languagehr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTraditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFishingStock (firearms)Fish stockCommissionStock assessmentFisheries management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

i. provide an overview of salmon catches, including unreported catches and catch and 2.1 & 2.2 release, and wor1dwide production of farmed and ranch ed salmon in 1998; ii.evaluate non-catch fishing mortality for all salmon gear; 2.3 iii.rep<It on significant deve1opments which might assist NASCO with the management of 2.4 salmon stocks; iv.develop a framework for stock rebuilding programmes; 2.5 v. provide a compilation of egg collections and juveni1e releases in 1998; 2.6 vi.provide a compi1ation of mi~Totag, finclip and external tag releases by ICES Member 2.7 Countries in 1998.h) With respect to Atlantic salmon in the North-East Atlantic Commission area:i. describe the events of the 1998 fisheries and the status of the stocks; 3.1-3.4ii. update the evaluation of the effects on stocks and homewater fisheries of the suspension of 3.5 commercial fishing activity at Faroes since 1991;iii. further deve1op the age-specific stock conservation limiL' for smal1er stock unit~ in the 3.7 Commission area, where possib1e based upon individual river -based estimates;iv. further deve1op methods to estimate the expected abundance of salmon for small er stock units in 3.6 the Commission area;V. provide catch options or alternative managt!ment advice with an assessmcnt of risks relative to 3.8 the objective of exceeding stock conservation 1itnits;vi. provide an estitnate of the hy-catch of salmon post-smo1ts in pelagic fisheries; 3.9 vii.identify relevant data dcficiencies, monitoring needs and research requirements.3.10 c) With respcct to Atlantic salmon in the North American Commission area:i. demi be the events of the 1998 fishcries and the status of the slocks: 4.1&4.2ii. update the eva1uation of the effects on US and Canadian stocks and tisheries of management 4.3 measurcs itnp1emented after 1991 in the Canadian commercial salmon fisheries; -iii. update age-specific stock conservation limits based on new information as availab1e; 4.4 iv.provide catch options or alternative management advice with an assessment of risks relative to 4.5 the objective of exceeding stock conservatiou 1imits;v. identify relevant data deficiencies, monitoring needs and research requirements.4.6 f!!li d) With respect to Atlantic salmon in the West Greenland Commission area: i. describc the events of the 1998 fisheries and the status of the stocks; l iL evaluate lhe effects on European and Norlh American stocks of lhc West Greenlandic 5.3 management measures since 1993;iii. provide a detailed explanation of an y changes to lhe model used to provide catch advice and of 5.4 lhe impacts of an y changes to lhe model on lhe calculated quota; iv.provide age-specific stock conservation limits (spawning targets) for all stocks occurring in lhe 5.5Cornmission area based on best available information;v. provide catch options or alternative management advice wilh an assessment of risks relative to 5.6 lhe objective of exceeding stock conservation limits;vi. identify relevant data deficiencies andresearch requirements; 5.7 vii.comment on tlle report of Workshop on Peer Rcvicw of ICES Salmon Model or in the 5.8absence of a Workshop, examine critically lhe model used to provide catch advice, looking at all lhe assumptions, and comment on lhe confidence limits on lhe output from lhe model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway))Same topicTraditional and Medicinal Uses of AnnonaceaeFrench-language works237,207