MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033758509

Proteomic Study Of The Ubiquitin E3 Ligase HUWE1 Interaction With Ubiquitin And ADP-Ribose Modified Proteins

2025· other· en· W7033758509 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUbiquitinUbiquitin ligaseInteractomeNEDD4DNA ligaseUbiquitin-Protein LigasesProtein–protein interactionProteomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ubiquitination and ADP-ribosylation are important post-translational modifications (PTMs), especially in cellular response to DNA damage. HECT, UBA, and WWE domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (HUWE1) is an important ubiquitin E3 ligase involved in many cellular processes. HUWE1 contains regions involved in substrate interaction and domains for PTM recognition. Specifically, HUWE1 WWE and tandem ubiquitin-binding motif (tUBM) domains interact with ADPr/iso-ADPr and ubiquitin, respectively. However, the interaction between these domains and cellular ADP-ribose and ubiquitin and potentially substrate interactions are not well investigated. Thus, this project aimed to investigate the interactome of HUWE1 WWE and tUBM domain, focusing on their ability to bind proteins modified by mono-ADP-ribose (MAR)/poly-ADP-ribose (PAR) and ubiquitin using GST pulldown assay. First, using Western blot and confocal microscopy, distinct dynamics of ubiquitination and ADP-ribosylation were observed in response to different DNA damage treatments. Second, the study demonstrated that the WWE-tUBM domain interacts with both cellular ADP-ribose and ubiquitin. Moreover, through a proteomic approach using affinity mass spectrometry, this study identified novel proteins that interact with the WWE and tUBM domains following Ultraviolet (UV) induced DNA damage. Together, the findings of this project contribute to a better understanding of how HUWE1 engages with its substrates and highlight the role of WWE and tUBM domains and their ability to recognize PTMs in mediating these interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)Same topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207