MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033769799

The rotational feedback on linear-momentum balance in glacial isostatic adjustmen

2015· article· en· W7033769799 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePublication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerturbation (astronomy)Rotational dynamicsRotation around a fixed axisViscoelasticityAngular momentumRotational speedAngular velocityCentrifugal forceMoment of inertiaAngular displacement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

known as glacial-isostatic adjustment (GIA), on the Earth’s rotational dynamics has long been known. Equally\nimportant is the effect of the changes in the rotational dynamics on the viscoelastic deformation of the Earth. This\nsignal, known as the rotational feedback, or more precisely, the rotational feedback on the sea-level equation, has\nbeen mathematically described by the sea-level equation extended for the term that is proportional to perturbation\nin the centrifugal potential and the second-degree tidal Love number.\nThe perturbation in the centrifugal force due to changes in the Earth’s rotational dynamics enters not only into\nthe sea-level equation, but also into the conservation law of linear momentum such that the internal viscoelastic\nforce, the perturbation in the gravitational force and the perturbation in the centrifugal force are in balance. Adding\nthe centrifugal-force perturbation to the linear-momentum balance creates an additional rotational feedback on\nthe viscoelastic deformations of the Earth. We term this feedback mechanism as the rotational feedback on the\nlinear-momentum balance.\nWe extend both the time-domain method for modelling the GIA response of laterally heterogeneous earth models\nand the traditional Laplace-domain method for modelling the GIA-induced rotational response to surface loading\nby considering the rotational feedback on linear-momentum balance. The correctness of the mathematical extensions\nof the methods is validated numerically by comparing the polar motion response to the GIA process and\nthe rotationally-induced degree 2 and order 1 spherical harmonic component of the surface vertical displacement\nand gravity field. We present the difference between the case where the rotational feedback on linear-momentum\nbalance is considered against that where it is not. Numerical simulations show that the resulting difference in radial\ndisplacement and sea-level change between these situations since the Last Glacial Maximum reaches values of \n25 m and 1.8 m, respectively. Furthermore, the surface deformation pattern is modified by up to 10% in areas\nof former or ongoing glaciation, but by up to 50% at the bottom of the southern Indian ocean. This also results\nin the movement of coastlines during the last deglaciation to differ between the two cases due to the difference\nin the ocean loading, which is seen for instance in the area around Hudson Bay, Canada, and along the Chinese,\nAustralian, or Argentinian coastlines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences)Same topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207