MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033812725

Spatiotemporal Forecasting At Scale

2019· article· en· W7033812725 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)Big dataAutoregressive integrated moving averageFlexibility (engineering)Probabilistic forecastingTaxisDemand forecasting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatiotemporal forecasting can be described as predicting the future value of a variable given when and where it will happen. This type of forecasting task has the potential to aid many institutions and businesses in asking questions, such as how many people will visit a given hospital in the next hour. Answers to these questions have the potential to spur significant socioeconomic impact, providing privacy-friendly short-term forecasts about geolocated events, which in turn can help entities to plan and operate more efficiently. These seemingly simple questions, however, present complex challenges to forecasting systems. With more GPS-enabled devices connected every year, from smartphones to wearables to IoT devices, the volume of collected spatiotemporal data that accompanies these questions has exploded, following the Big Data trend. This thesis proposes a forecasting framework that employs distributed computing in order to scale its internal components and overcome this high data volume scenario. It also designs discretization components that allow for flexibility in the framing of the forecasting questions. Furthermore, it devises a Geographically Global Model (GGM) backed by an ensemble of Stochastic Gradient Boosted Trees, a collection of Geographically Local Models (GLMs) backed by ARIMA models, and a non-linear blending of those as part of its multistage machine learning pipeline in order to boost its performance and stability. The merit of the proposed research is evaluated in three experiments, each of which comprises millions of records, namely forecasting hourly taxi demand in the city of New York, forecasting daily crime density in the city of Chicago, and forecasting hourly visits to places of interest across Canada. The experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed Spatiotemporal Forecasting Framework in forecasting stable results across the three domains, while also outperforming the naive baseline by at least 49.8% with respect to the SMAPE residuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207