?smail Hakk? Bursevi'nin "?erh-i Ebyat-? Hac? Bayram-? Veli" adl? eseri (metin ve inceleme)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tezimizin amac?, ?smail Hakk? Bursevi'nin ?erh-i Ebyat-? Hac? Bayram-? Veli adl? yazma eserini yeni harflere aktarmak ve burada yer alan ba?l?ca tasavvuf kavramlar?n? a??klamakt?r. XIV. y?zy?lda ya?ayan ve Bayramilik'in kurucusu kabul edilen Hac? Bayram Veli ile XVI. y?zy?l?n ikinci yar?s? ve XVII. y?zy?l?n ilk ?eyre?inde ya?ayan ve Celvetiyye'nin me?hur ?eyhlerinden biri olarak kabul edilen, ?smail Hakk? Bursevi, ?ok y?nl? iki mutasavv?f?m?zd?r. Hem zahiri hem de bat?ni ilimlerde s?z sahibi olmu?lard?r. Hac? Bayram Veli'nin ?u an elimizde d?rt ?iiri, Bursevi'nin ise olduk?a fazla eseri mevcuttur. ?smail Hakk? Bursevi, ?erh-i Ebyat-? Hac? Bayram-? Veli adl? eserinde Hac? Bayram Veli'nin ilgili ?iirinde, ?zerinde durdu?u konular? daha geni? bir ?ekilde ?rnekler vererek a??klamaktad?r. Tezimizin I. B?l?m?nde, Bursevi'nin ?zellikler ?zerinde durdu?u bu kavramlar, kendisinin ve di?er mutasavv?flar?n bak?? a??lar?yla birlikte verilmi?tir. ?al??mam?z?n II. b?l?m?nde ise, ?smail Hakk? Bursevi'nin s?z konusu eseri, g?n?m?z T?rk yaz?s?na ?evrilmi?tir. ) The purpose of my thesis is to transfer the writing work, called Sherh-i Ebyat-? Hac? Bayram Veli of Bursevi and to determine the all sufi concepts, on this work. Hac? Bayram, lived in XIV. Century had been known as the founder of Bayramiyye and ?smail Hakk? Bursevi who had lived in the second part of XVI and the first quarter of XVII. was one of famous sheikhs of Celvetiyye. Being a high qualified sufi Hac? Bayram and Ismail Hakk? Bursevi had carried out their duties both as an external and esoteric. Now, we have four poems of Hac? Bayram Veli and also lots of studies of Bursevi. Ismail Hakk? Bursevi, in this work of Sherh-i Ebyat-? Hac? Bayram Veli- is explaining the subjects too long and also giving more examples than the poem of Hac? Bayram Veli. At the first part of our thesis, these concepts that are Bursevi especially interested in ??? is studied together with his own and others' sufi's opinions. At the second part of our work, Ismail Hakk? Bursevi's work of art was translated into today's Turkish text.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.086 | 0.049 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".