Risco de fragilização do idoso : estratégia de promoção à saúde fortalecendo a convivência comunitária
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is an intervention project, the result of the Specialization Course in Primary Care at UFPR, funded by UNA-SUS.The Family Health Strategy (FHS) seeks to promote the quality of life of the Brazilian population and to intervene in factors that put health at risk, such as lack of physical activity, poor diet and tobacco use, with comprehensive, equitable and continuous attention. .We highlight the importance of strategies aimed at health care for the elderly, since the number of patients aged 60 years or older corresponds to 20% of the population in the area covered by the team.In addition, the agreement between the state and municipal primary care services and the elderly care networks is reinforced.Many elderly have health conditions or problems that contribute to the weakening and loss of independence to perform daily life activities.Added to these factors are situations of malnutrition, worsening of chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes, renal failure, lack of care and continuation with the offered cataract treatment and hearing evaluation.This increases the risk of the elderly losing autonomy and independence, and evolving into frailty, making them vulnerable to adverse outcomes.Thus, the general objective of the present intervention project was to develop health promotion actions for the elderly assisted at the Quebec Primary Health Care Unit identified with risk of weakening in the context of Primary Health Care.An action research was conducted, whose first phase was performed the individual care of the elderly applying the IVCF-20 instrument, according to municipal protocol.The elderly were stratified by clinical-functional vulnerability (fragile, at risk of weakening or robust) and the main factors of weakness of the elderly were identified.After identifying the weakening factors, a health promotion activity was elaborated, including discussion circles on depression and family insufficiency, on the elderly care network and available instruments to promote community life with a view to preventing depression, and a tea. the afternoon of fraternization, when the elderly group of Casa de Emmaus was introduced.At this last meeting, the participants were given a fridge message rack, made by the team.It was observed that there was an improvement in the quality of life of the elderly, according to reports and information from the users themselves during the following visits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".