MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034054611

sno+ background study: polonium on acrylic vessel surface and radon assay

2023· dissertation· en· W7034054611 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Science and Libraries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadonPoloniumBackground radiationScintillatorNeutrinoOverburdenRadiationDetectorParticle detector
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SNO+ is a 780 tonnes organic liquid scintillator neutrino detector located at Vale’s Creighton mine, Sudbury, ON. 2 km overburden of rock above helps to achieve the low cosmic radiation background level of SNO+. Meanwhile, radioactive material in the rock can decay and produce radiation in the region of interest for the search of 0νββ decay. SNO+ is looking for neutrinos at very low energy and thus it is crucial to have a low background environment. My thesis evaluates two kinds of background sources: 222Rn and 210Po. 222Rn is the progeny of 238U in the rock. The water and gas assays are used to monitor the 222Rn concentration in the surrounding cavity water and other parts of the experiment or other gas volumes in SNOLAB. The analysis of the SNO+ data helps to understand the 210Po activity on the internal surface of the detector’s acrylic vessel. The 222Rn level in the cavity water is below the target of 4.5 × 10−13 gU238/gH2O. The Rn levels in the LN2 plant and international dewar are at a 10−4 reduction factor compared to mine air. The 210Po background level in the internal AV is holding a relatively constant level of about 1800 events per second. Spatially, the 210Po backgrounds are more active at the equator and the belly plate regions. The estimated number of 210Pb atoms deposited on the AV inner surface is 1.84 × 1012 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicInformation Science and LibrariesFrench-language works237,207