“From the Synagogue to the Streets”: Outsider Rabbis, Mississippi, and the Civil Rights Movement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The historiography of Jews in the Civil Rights Movement is extensive, and recent scholarship has reevaluated the relationships between Jews and civil rights organizations. The role of southern Jews in critical states, such as Mississippi, is often amalgamated into one category: supportive but scared. The focus on two rabbis known for their outspokenness regarding racial equality, Charles Mantinband of Hattiesburg and Perry Nussbaum of Jackson, is central to most southern Jewish studies. However, it neglects aspects of their background. Neither rabbi was a native Mississippian nor accepted as truly Southern due to the stances they took regarding racial equality. Charles Mantinband was from Virginia and originally held segregationist views until attending City College of New York. Born and raised in Canada, Perry Nussbaum developed a different understanding of race and inequality. Although each rabbi attempted to make Mississippi home, they faced backlash regarding their stances on equality due to being deemed outsiders by Mississippi’s closed society. This thesis argues that Mantiband’s and Nussbaum’s relationships with each other, their congregations, and the wider community are crucial in understanding the Mississippi Jewish experience during the Civil Rights Movement. The study of these rabbis has three objectives: understanding how their congregations reacted to the rabbis’ activism, why they were seen as outsiders and “othered” by their own communities because of their views on racial equality, and the broader Mississippi Jewish community’s relationship with ideas of racial superiority and being seen as white. Reasserting these issues in the historiography complicates the relationship between Mississippi Jews and the Civil Rights Movement by refocusing Rabbis Nussbaum and Mantinband as important activists in their communities and congregations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.035 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".