MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034290094

Tree Swallow Banding Near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

2024· article· en· W7034290094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTree (set theory)Sequence (biology)Ectotherm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

efore the settlement of the nearly treeless plains of southern Saskatchewan (Houston and Bechard 1983), cavity nesting birds such as the Mountain Bluebird (Sialia currucoides) and Tree Swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) were uncommon because of the lack of nest sites.They depended on decayed stumps and in the case of the bluebird, crevices in clay cliffs.Settlement brought telephone poles and fence posts with holes dug by Northern Flickers (Colapres auratus), mail boxes, twine boxes on binders, and crevices in buildings.These made excellent nesting sites, resulting in increasing numbers of Mountain Bluebirds and Tree Swallows (Houston 1977).Unfortunately, House Sparrows (Passer domesticus), followed in the 1940s by European Starlings ISturnus vulgaris), also increased in number, and gradually usurped most of the sites suitable for Mountain Bluebirds.The lack of nest sites, and the resultant decrease in bluebird populations, motivated Dr. Jack Lane of Brandon, Manitoba, and his Junior Birders, to build and set out nest boxes, each with an entrance hole 1.5 inches in diameter, too small to admit a starling.Observing Lane's success, Lorne Scott of Figure 1.Map of Prairie Bluebird Trail from Denholm, ß Glaslyn Indian Head, Saskatchewan, began building boxes and connected with Lane's trail in 1968.The Saskatoon Junior Natural History Society began a trail that met with Scott's in 1970 at Raymore, 120 miles southeast of Saskatoon (Scott 1970, Houston 1971).By 1975 there were about 2500 miles of connecting trails with the extremities (at Denholm, near North Battleford, Saskatchewan, and Winnipeg, Manitoba) about 600 miles apart (Figure 1).For a few years we tried to monitor all boxes on the western portion of the trail, as far east as Raymore, but after 1973 we restricted regular visits to those 250 (on average) boxes between Delisle and Hanley.This regularly studied portion of the trail, from northwest to southeast, is 76 miles long, 36 miles on the west side of the South Saskatchewan river and 40 east of the river.All of these boxes are within 40 miles of Saskatoon, and the most distant extremities are 48 miles apart (as the bluebird flies).Our boxes are placed on fence posts.To minimize their use by the House Sparrow and House Wren (Troglodytes aedon), they are positioned away from farm yards and preferably at a distance from trees or bushes.When the boxes are placed along busy roads, there is less temptation for vandals to stop and investigate.The boxes are Saskatchewan to Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Same topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207