A sustentabilidade aplicada no sistema construtivo wood frame
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the 60's, in face of the different influences and problems that the human being has generated to nature, a concern with the environment and how to preserve it arose. Among the sectors that most intervene in the environment is civil construction, so it was necessary to search for ways in which this sector could mitigate its interference to the environment, it was in this scenario that the wood frame constructive system began to gain its space. , evolving from wood construction techniques used in the medieval period in central and northern Europe and becoming the technological system that is used and established today in several countries such as: Japan, Canada, the United States and other European countries. The wood frame has several qualities that make the construction sector more efficient in productivity and sustainability, among them are: clean and dry works producing less waste and using little water, capture and retention of CO2, forest management, productivity and constructive agility, quality manufacturing, energy efficiency, comfort, among other aspects. When compared to the traditional and artisanal system of Brazilian masonry, the wood frame stands out in several areas such as sustainability and efficiency, however in Brazil there is still some fear regarding wooden constructions, largely due to the lack of knowledge, both in terms of laymen and professionals, this implies a constructive sector still growing in the country and lacking publicity. Through literary reviews of works focused on sustainability, wood and wood frame, information about the ecological advantages of the construction system was separated, as well as its characteristics, benefits and construction method, to contribute to the dissemination of knowledge of the system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".