MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7034370300

Towards atomic parity violation at the francium trapping facility

2015· dissertation· en· W7034370300 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParity (physics)PhotoionizationTrappingAtomic numberWeak interactionIsotopeAtom (system on chip)Stark effect
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of the Francium Trapping Facility at TRIUMF, Canada and progress towards an atomic parity violation measurement in francium are underway. Francium (Z = 87) is the heaviest alkali. Its simple atomic structure and large number of nucleons make it an attractive system for weak interaction studies. For this reason, atomic parity violation in francium is an active area of study, and recent years have seen significant progress towards that end. Laser trapping of francium at Triumf has only recently been achieved, and several useful physics measurements for the future atomic parity violation experiment have been performed. The future measurement is of the highly forbidden 7S - 8S optical transition amplitude, which is suppressed by ~ 10^10 compared to an allowed transition amplitude. This will be achieved by interference with an allowed Stark transition, similar to the 6S - 7S optical atomic parity violation measurement in cesium. The commissioning of the two-chamber trapping apparatus as well as the development of the electric field plates for the Stark interference will be reported on. The physics measurements include the photoionization cross-section from the 7P_3/2 states, and isotope shifts of the D1 line. The cross-section must be known to evaluate a potential atom loss mechanism from the 506 nm light of the 7S - 8S excitation, negatively impacting the trapped population. Atomic theory calculations, which are required for the extraction of the weak coupling constants from the atomic measurement, may be benchmarked against these isotope shifts, allowing theorists to refine their techniques for the more sensitive evaluations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies→French-language works237,207→