MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034500806

Suicidal behavior among indigenous Sami in Arctic Norway : a special focus on adolescents and young adults

2007· dissertation· en· W7034500806 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Innovation and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousSuicide preventionEthnic groupPoison controlInjury preventionArcticPopulationOccupational safety and health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the 1950’s the global suicide rates have continued to increase, and today suicide has\nbecome an important public-health problem worldwide (World Health Organization (WHO),\n2002). According to WHO there are approximately one million deaths from suicide each year\nworldwide, and about 20 times this number of people attempt suicide (2002). There are\nsubstantial variations in the national suicide rates (Lester, 1997), and in addition great\nvariation in rates within the same country and between different ethnic groups (Roberts, Chen\n& Roberts, 1997). During the last decades suicide rates have increased alarmingly among\nindigenous people, and especially among indigenous residing in the Arctic, such as the lnuit\nin Greenland (Leineweber et al., 2001) and in Canada (Sigurdson et al., 1994), and among\nAlaskan Natives in the US (Borowsky et al., 1999). The increase in suicide rates among\nindigenous people in the Arctic have been so alarmingly high that it has been described as an\nepidemic level (Bjerregaard & Lynge, 2006; Leenaars, 2006) and it has been declared that\ncertain indigenous people have the highest suicide risk of any identifiable cultural (or ethnic)\ngroup (Leenaars, 2006; Kirmayer, 1994). Unfortunately, suicide has become the leading cause\nof death for young indigenous people, especially among males, and is a significant contributor\nto potential years of life lost. Although there is carried out research on the prevalence of\nsuicidal behavior among several indigenous people, e.g. in Canada, Alaska, Greenland,\nSweden, Australia, New Zealand, our understanding of suicidal behavior among indigenous\npeople is still limited (Cutcliffe, 2005; Leenaars, 2006; Stewart, 2005).<br>\nThere is no registration of ethnicity in the national population register in Norway, for\nthat reason there are neither official statistics of health and living conditions nor suicide rates\nfor indigenous Sami (hereafter called Sami). There have so far been conducted limited\nresearch on health and living conditions among Sami in Norway, and suicidal behavior has\nnot previously been studied in a systematically way. Although some Sami communities have\nexperienced high rates of suicides, there is in general lack of specific prevention strategies.\nEpidemiological knowledge about suicidal behavior among Sami is important for\nimplementation of appropriate prevention strategies in Sami communities, and in addition\nuseful to public health practitioners and policy makers in addressing this problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)Same topicEducation, Innovation and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207