Treino intensivo de demandas funcionais para adolescentes com paralisia cerebral
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP) present limitations to perform daily living activities. Goal-oriented functional training is considered effective in promoting daily functioning of children with CP. However, rehabilitation services for adolescents with CP are scarce and do not always meet their specific demands. It is possible that an individualized goal-oriented functional training promotes daily functioning of adolescents with CP. The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility and effects of intensive functional goal training directed at adolescents with PC. A feasibility study was carried out with 12 adolescents with CP, ages 12-17. The adolescents were classified in levels I to IV according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and in levels I to III according to the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). Adolescents identified their main functional goals through the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Individualized training lasted 2 weeks, 5 times a week, 3 hours a day and it was conducted at the rehabilitation center in groups of 4 to 6 adolescents. Adolescents were asked to practice their functional goals at home for 1 hour a day. Outcome measures included the COPM (performance and satisfaction), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) (functional skills and caregiver assistance in self-care and mobility), Participation and Environment Measure Children and Youth (PEM-CY) (frequency and involvement at home), Children Helping Out-Responsibilities, Expectations and Supports (CHORES) (performance and independence in household tasks) and the Box and Blocks Test (BBT). Data were collected one month prior to intervention (T1), before intervention (T2), post-intervention (T3) and 3 months after intervention (T4) by an examiner blinded to the procedures. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests were used to analyze differences in primary and secondary outcomes among the different moments of assessment. At the end of the intervention, adolescents answered a satisfaction questionnaire. Significant changes were observed in COPM performance and satisfaction from the perspective of adolescents and caregivers, as well as functional skills in self-care and caregiver assistance in self-care and mobility (p<0,05). In addition, there was a significant increase in performance and independence scores in household tasks and in the speed to use the dominant upper limb (p <0.05). In the follow-up measure, improvements observed after the intervention were maintained. There was no significant difference in frequency and involvement scores in adolescent’s participation at home and in the speed to use the non-dominant upper limb (p> 0.05). The intensive training of individualized goals was feasible and promoted positive results in the achievement of goals prioritized and in adolesncent’s daily functioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".