Traffic Jams Across the Borders: Travelling, Dwelling, and the Case of Indian Canadian Fiction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este ensayo explora las dimensiones teóricas de “la frontera” como tropo para estudiar la \npresente condición de movilidad, real y figurada, entre naciones y culturas, así como su \naplicabilidad en el campo de la narrativa contemporánea canadiense de la diáspora. La \npropia nación canadiense ha sido, de un modo implícito, fundada en esa noción de ‘diáspora.’ \nSu símbolo oficial, el mosaico (deliberadamente diferente al crisol americano), es explícitamente \ndiaspórico, pues se basa en la existencia de agrupaciones sociales y culturales que \nmantienen identificaciones fuera del espacio y el tiempo de lo nacional. Este artículo analiza \nlos efectos del énfasis contemporáneo en la movilidad y en el cruce de fronteras sobre las \nnociones de cultura e identidad. Mi estudio se centra en ejemplos de la narrativa indocanadiense \nreciente, pues parece paradigmática de estos cambios y de la validez de las teorías \n“fronterizas” en el análisis de los textos de la diáspora tanto dentro como fuera de \nCanadá.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.048 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".