What does Truth and Reconciliation teach us about degrowth in settler societies? An exploration of the interconnections between degrowth and the TRC calls to action
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Degrowth offers pathways to stay within ecological limits while increasing human and planetary wellbeing. As settler scholars living in so-called Canada, we see a gap in the degrowth branch of ecological economics regarding degrowth transitions within settler societies, as much of this literature comes out of a European context. In this paper, we attempt to analyze the Calls to Action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, to explore how a degrowth transition may help us move forward together on the path to Reconciliation with (and decolonization of) First Nations, Metis and Inuit Peoples. We do this by reviewing relevant academic and grey literature, showing the interconnections between degrowth’s emphasis on ecological limits and reconciliation with the Land; on autonomy and Indigenous sovereignty; and on moving towards a multiplicity of knowledges to live ‘the good life’. Here, we offer an exploration of these interconnections to open up three lines of inquiry. We explore how we might ground degrowth transitions in reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples and the Land, question what degrowth means on occupied Land, and move towards pluralistic and decolonial degrowth imaginaries. We put forward this contribution to the ecological economics and degrowth communities as a challenge to engage with and act upon the Calls to Action from the TRC, and their implications for degrowth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it