Ο ποιητής Λεονάρδος Ντελλαπόρτας ως πρεσβευτής της Βενετίας εις Τυνησίαν κατ’ ανέκδοτα βενετικά έγγραφα (1389)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le poete cretois Leonard Dellaporta (XIV - XV s.), dans\nun de ses poemes inedits, recemment decouverts par l’auteur de cette\netude (voir sa communication dans les Πρακτικά de l’Academie\nd’Athenes, t. 29, 1954, pp. 32-44), nous raconte, entre autres evenements\nde sa vie mouvementee de militaire en Italie, d’avocat en Crete\net d’ambassadeur de Venise aupres des souverains musulmans et grecs,\nsa mission diplomatique aupres du sultan de Tunisie. Or, cette mission\nest attestee par quatre documents que l’auteur a trouves dans les\narchives d’Etat de Venise (Senalo Misti, Reg. 41, ff. 3V , 8r - 9r , 45r )\net qu’il publie et commente ici.\nLe deuxieme et le troisieme de ces documents, datds du 31 mai\n1389, contiennent les instructions (commissiones ) donnees par le Doge\nde Venise Ant. Venerio a Leonard Dellaporta, envoye pour delivrer\nles captifs et conclure un nouveau traite avec le sultan de Tunisie\n( Abou’l - ‘Abbas), et a Leonard Trevisan, vice-capitaine de FAdriatique,\nqui fut charge d’amener Dellaporta en Tunisie. Le premier concerne\nsa nomination d’avocat a Candie, office que Venise lui a attribue\nvingt jours plus tot (10 mai), pour le recompenser, sans doute,\nd’avance de cette mission dangereuse. Le quatrieme document, enfin,\na pour objet la decision (prise le 9 decembre 1389) de proceder a l’election\nd’un nouvel ambassadeur de Venise, qui aurait aussi les prerogatives\nde consul, aupres dudit sultan de Tunisie, apres le retour et\nselon les suggestions de Dellaporta; cet ambassadeur et consul fut certainement Jacques Valaresso, qui a reussi a conclure le traite connu\ndu 4 juillet 1391.\nCes documents eclairent d’une lumiere nouvelle non seulement la\nvie du poete grec, mais aussi l’histoire des relations diplomatiques de\nVenise avec les sultans Hafsides de Tunisie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".