Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
THE on the weight ascending, the cross-section of the tubing is increased.The nickel bar was protected by a double metal screen from thermal disturbances due to the heater.A constant stream of cold water was kept playing on the unheated end of the bar.The thermometers used were some of the Kew standard thermometers used by Pro fessor Tait and Dr Mitchell.Temperatures above 200C.were not used, and as the readings on the majority of the thermometers varied in the course of an experiment through a range of about 1C., the thermometers were simply read by the naked eye to the nearest quarter of a degree.One could be quite certain of avoiding making any error due to parallax of more than that amount.A little mercury was put in each of the thermometer holes to give good thermal contact between the bulbs of the ther mometers and the bar.No amalgamation of the nickel has ever been observed.A steady state as regards the distribution of temperature along the bar was not reached in five hours from the time the gas at the heater was lighted, and the readings on the thermometers usually increased at the rate of about a quarter of a degree per hour for a few hours more.The following table shows the readings (uncorrected) obtained over an interval of nearly twenty-four hours on 18th July 1894 and the following morning.The gas was lighted at 8.30 a.m.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it