MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7035924767

Aboriginal Youth Justice: The Over Incarceration Crisis and the Role of Gladue Principles at Bail

2017· article· en· W7035924767 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCLARITYLegislationImprisonmentSupreme courtCriminal justiceEconomic JusticeParliamentInterpretation (philosophy)Deportation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a crisis in Canada involving our criminal justice system: the over incarceration of Aboriginal people. The situation is even starker when it comes to Aboriginal youth. Parliament and the courts have recognized this issue and taken steps to remedy this phenomenon through legislation and interpretation of relevant provisions. Section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code was introduced as an amendment to provisions on sentencing, urging judges to consider the unique circumstances of Aboriginal people. R v Gladue, a 1999 case by the Supreme Court of Canada, interpreted section 718.2(e), providing more clarity on how exactly to recognize the history of colonization and displacement that First Nations communities experienced and consider the unique circumstances of Aboriginal people that factor into their interactions with the justice system. These considerations came to be known as Gladue principles. This research involves the application of Gladue principles at the bail stage for Aboriginal youth. While there has been some research conducted around the application of Gladue factors at bail for adults, there is very limited research and conflicting messages by the courts when it comes to Gladue principles for youth bail decisions. This research examined reported youth bail cases involving an Aboriginal accused and documented if and how Gladue principles were applied in each case. The research has shown that cases involving Aboriginal youth have not consistently applied Gladue principles to bail decisions. This is likely, at least in part, because of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), which places emphasis on alternatives to imprisonment for youth involved with the justice system. Although presenting alternatives to custody is part of the aims of a Gladue analysis, it is argued in the research that relying on the YCJA alone does not satisfy the factors involved in a Gladue principles application, and therefore, Gladue should be applied consistently to youth bail cases. This paper aims to present justification for Gladue principles at youth bail as well as ways in which this application could be carried out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207