Argentina entre los Centenarios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este ensayo sintetiza diversos fenómenos vividos por la sociedad argentina en el plazo que media entre el primer Centenario, ocurrido en 1910, y el tiempo presente, próximo al Bicentenario. En 1910 había una gran expectativa respecto del país, se creía que su impulso hacia la modernidad lo transformaría en una Nación notable. Pero eso no ocurrió, entre otras cosas debido a los largos ciclos de falta de estado de derecho que ensombrecieron al país. No obstante, y más allá de las contradicciones, se muestra el empeño por la educación fundamental, la singular recepción de la inmigración ultramarina, el proceso precoz de transición demográfica, el desarrollo cultural y científico, la era del estado de bienestar, y los cambios en materia de derechos de ciudadanía ocurridos en el último cuarto de siglo. This essay presents a synthesis of the diverse phenomena experienced by Argentine society between the time of the first Centenary, in 1910, and that of the present, nearing the second Bicentenary. In 1910, there were great expectations (s added to expectation) that the country would become an outstandingly modern Nation. However, those hopes proved wrong, due, among other things, to the absence of the rule of law during large cycles of time. Nonetheless, and in spite of the contradictions, there were many successful efforts to establish public primary schools, a singular reception of masses of immigrants, a fast demographic transformation, cultural and scientific development, welfare state, and changes in civil rights that have taken place during the last quarter of the twentieth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".