The Agbiotech Bulletin, Vol 3, Issue 2, February 1995
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Agbiotech Bulletin Vol 3, Issue 2, February 1995 Code Number:NL95017 Size of Files: Text: 64K No associated graphic files Features Biotechnology: A Tool for Sustainable Development Says IBAC Nature of the organization Canadian Institute of Biotechnology (CIB) Position on CEPA Regulations Non-Scientists Introduced to Biotechnology News U of S Investigates Legume Inoculants SRC to Employ Plants to Test for Toxics Prairie Ecosystem Study (PECOS) seeks inputs Saskatoon Companies Move to Innovation Place Regulatory Guidelines Released Biomira Expands Clinical Trials for Cancer Vaccine Simple Test Aids Defense Against Top Cereal Disease BST Has American Customers Satisfied North Carolina Bioscience Initiative for Minorities Cyanamid to Test Improved Bioinsecticide Calgene Receives U.S. Patent for Plant Oils Gene China Trademark Association Established First Transgenic Rice Harvested in Japan Ethanol from organic wastes Trends Saskatchewan Initiative to Enhance Wheat Starch Regulatory Efficiencies Planned to Cut Red Tape Additional Flavr Savr Tomato Line Non regulated Lighter Regulation for Transgenic Plants Coming Slowly to Europe Super Rice Commercially Available by Year 2000 Alliances PBI/CanAmera Foods Sign Agreement Alberta and California Companies to Merge Canadian Biotech Alliances Double Cooperative Research South of the Boarder Mogen/PGS Enter Licensing Agreement Finance Royal Bank Moves into Saskatoon's Innovation Place Royal Bank Lead Partner in Funding to Commercialize Research Labour Venture Capital to Appear in March Alliances Key to Global Marketing R&D tax regulations enhanced for small business The World Bank and Ag Biotech Projects Issues Goodale Shares Vision for Canadian Ag Industry Education for a high tech society BST Treated Cows Suffer Less Mastitis Risk-Assessment Experiments and Biotechnology EDF launches petition on bioengineered foods Gene-altered java: the next biotech controversy? Attitudes Consumer Biotechnology Projects Surveys Stakeholders Focus Groups Reveal Public Attitude to biotech Opinion Polls Okay Biotech Resources Oat Conference/Barley Genetics Symposium Method for Oil Analysis Technology opportunities available Business Cooperation Network (BCNet) IDRC Annual Report Canadian R&D News Guide to Writing Scientific Reports/Papers NAPPO Technopoles: 21st Century Industrial Complexes Plant Genome Database Economic Prospects for Ag Biotech Kentucky to Host Plant Commercialization Conference Bibliography on Biotech and Sustainable Agriculture Ag Biotech in Mexico People Watch Agriculture Canada Royal Bank Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) Study Centre Cominco Fertilizers IDRC AERO Alternative Energy Resources Organization (AERO)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.394 | 0.455 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".