Andr? Malraux'nun hayali m?zesinin ?a?da? sanat politikalar? ve g?ncel sanat projeleri a??s?ndan ?nemi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aby Warburg sanat eserlerinin r?prod?ksiyonlar?n? bir araya getirip kendi mant??? i?erisinde d?zenlemeler yapt??? ?Mnemosyne Atlas? panolar?n? ve oval bi?imdeki, standart katalog sistemini kullanmayan, kitaplar?n kullan?c?n?n ili?kilendirmesine g?re yer de?i?tirdi?i k?t?phanesini 20. y?zy?l?n ilk ?eyre?inde geli?tirir. Andr? Malraux da sanat eserlerinin fotografik r?prod?ksiyonlar? dolay?s?yla sanat tarihinin geleneksel anlay???n? bozan, her d?nemden ve her t?rde sanat eserinin bir araya gelebildi?i ?znel bir kurgu olan ?Hayali M?ze?'sini II. D?nya Sava??'ndan hemen sonra, 1947'de geli?tirmeye ba?lar. Aby Warburg ve Andr? Malraux'nun yirminci y?zy?l?n ilk yar?s?nda ortaya koyduklar? sanat kuramlar?, yirmibirinci y?zy?lda teknolojinin olanaklar?yla yeniden g?ncel hale gelmi?tir. Warburg ve Malraux'nun geli?tirdikleri kurgu g?n?m?zde hipermetinsel ve rizomatik bir yap?ya kar??l?k gelmektedir. Her t?rl? g?r?nt? ve bilgiye internet ?zerinden ula?abilmek m?mk?nd?r. Web 2.0'?n bilgi y?kleme, yorum ekleme ve d?zenleme yapmaya uygun yap?s? aktif kullan?c?lar? ortaya ??karm??t?r. Yani internet ?zerindeki g?rsel, metinsel her t?r bilgiyi, kullan?c? al?p, yorumlay?p, yeniden sunabilir. Bir zamanlar fotografik teknolojiyle ger?ekle?en yeni yorum bi?imleri, g?n?m?zde bilgisayar teknolojisinde kar??l???n? bulmu?tur. Sanat??lar?n yap?tlar? d?nemlerinin ruhunu yans?t?r. Tezin son b?l?m?nde, Bellek Atlas? ve Hayali M?ze'nin ilham kayna?? oldu?u sanat??lar?n ?al??malar? ??z?mlenmi?tir. In the first quarter of 20th century, Aby Warburg developed the ?Menomsyne Atlas? panels, where he gathered the reproductions of artworks and made arrangements within a certain rationale, and an oval library, where the books moved according to the association of the users without a standard catalogue system. Andr? Malraux, on the other hand, developed his ?Imaginary Museum,? spoiling the traditional understanding of the history of art and being a subjective fiction where artworks coming from all ages and genres could come together through their photographic reproductions, immediately after WWII, in 1947. The art theories put forward by Aby Warburg and Andr? Malraux in the first half of the twentieth century became current through technology in the 21st century. The fiction developed by Warburg and Malraux corresponds to a hypertextual and rhizomatic structure today. It is possible to access any kind of image and information over internet. The Web 2.0 structure that allows the users to load information, add comments and make arrangements created active users. That is to say, the users can get, interpret and present again any visual or textual information over internet. New ways of interpretation, which once were made possible with photographic technique, are now expressed through computer technology. The works of artists reflect the spirit of their age. The final chapter of this thesis analyses the works of the arts inspiring the Menomsyne Atlas and Imaginary Museum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".