Approaches to teamwork and leadership training in maritime education and training institutions : a comparative analysis of the perspectives of seafarers towards teamwork and leadership across different regions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comparative analysis of the perspectives of seafarers towards teamwork and leadership across different regions Degree:Master of Science Teamwork and leadership skills play a vital role in all activities on board a vessel.Taking into consideration the importance of the human element, the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, as amended (STCW) went through another substantive revision in 2010 called the Manila Amendments which focused on updating the convention and addressing issues which are anticipated in the near future.One of the integral changes included new requirements for teamwork and leadership training.This amendment required seafarers to undergo mandatory training in leadership and team working skills at operational level and leadership and management skills at management level.Since then, a number of Maritime Education and Training institutions (METIs) across different regions of the world have started training its seafarers to inculcate these
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".