MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036209073

Biosignatures of fossil and modern cyanobacteria

2024· dissertation· en· W7036209073 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueORBi (University of Liège) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and Biological Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyanobacteriaBiospherePhotosynthesisProterozoicEndosymbiosisCycadPhototrophAlgaeTaxonAnoxygenic photosynthesis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyanobacteria are well-known for being involved in events that profoundly modified the early biosphere and Earth. Cyanobacteria are the only prokaryotes doing the oxygenic photosynthesis. Thanks to this ability, they played a role in the oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans during the Great Oxidation Event that took place around 2.4 Ga, which generated the development of new oxygenated ecological niches. Moreover, they are the ancestors of the chloroplast, the organelle where oxygenic photosynthesis takes place in eukaryotes. The chloroplast was formed during primary endosymbiosis from an engulfed and undigested cyanobacterium by a primitive unicellular eukaryote. Through the development of oxygenic niches and the formation of the chloroplast, cyanobacteria had a key role in the diversification of eukaryotes. Consequently, their study is of great importance to understand the evolution of the early Life and Earth. Despite this importance and the abundance of microfossils interpreted as cyanobacteria, their unambiguous fossil record remains scarce. Only three microfossils were identified for certainty as cyanobacteria using a set of criteria unique to this group of microorganisms. This thesis focuses on the detailed study of microfossils interpreted as probable cyanobacterial microfossils, which may in fact represent also other prokaryotes or eukaryotes. The objective is to evaluate, using new criteria, and confirm or infirm with certainty their identification and improve our understanding of their early diversification. The morphology, morphometry, ultrastructure, chemical composition and elements distribution of selected Proterozoic fossil taxa (Polysphaeroides filiformis, Arctacellularia tetragonala, Chlorogloeaopsis spp., Navifusa majensis) were analyzed using a combination of techniques. These data enabled to interpret reliably two microfossil taxa as cyanobacteria, Polysphaeroides filiformis (Mbuji-Mayi Supergroup, Democratic Republic of the Congo) and Navifusa majensis (Tawallah Group, Australia; Shaler Supergroup, Canada). The multicellular branching P. filiformis was interpreted as a cyanobacterium belonging to the Stigonematacean family. Moreover, the ultrastructure of N. majensis highlighted the oldest thylakoids preserved in fossil cells, bringing a direct evidence for oxygenic photosynthesis. Also, the detection of nickel in intracellular inclusions within fossil cells highlighted the preservation of degraded chlorophyll in the form of Ni-geoporphyrins. Therefore, this thesis proposes two new calibration points for cyanobacterial molecular clocks: 1. a first point (minimum age ~1 Ga) for heterocytous nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria; 2. a second point (minimum age ~1.75 Ga) for the divergence of thylakoid-bearing cyanobacteria from the thylakoid-less cyanobacteria (Gloeobacter). Finally, this work also shows that the study of modern lineages is important for the comparison with microfossils as modern microorganisms may produce compounds exclusively found in a particular group, e.g. cyanobacteria with the production of scytonemin and gloeocapsin, UV-screening cyanobacterial pigments, which could be looked for in microfossils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueORBi (University of Liège)Same topicPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207